Skip to content
A difficult conversation. A wave of shame after making a mistake. The tightness in your chest when something reminds you of the past.
Most of us have moments like these. And most of us, at some point, try to sidestep them.
We scroll. We distract ourselves. We keep busy. We tell ourselves it is “not a big deal”. This instinct to move away from discomfort is deeply human. Yet when that pattern becomes automatic, it turns into emotional avoidance, which is the tendency to push away, suppress, or escape from difficult inner experiences rather than facing them.
This article explores why we do this, what it costs us, and how we can respond differently.
What Emotional Avoidance Really Means
Emotional avoidance is more than simply not talking about your feelings. Psychologists often describe it as experiential avoidance – the tendency to avoid or control unwanted internal experiences, even when doing so leads to longer-term difficulties (Berghoff et al., 2016).
This can include avoiding thoughts, suppressing emotions, withdrawing from situations, or numbing through distraction.
In everyday life, emotional avoidance may look like:
- Keeping busy to avoid thinking about relationship tension
- Laughing off hurt feelings rather than acknowledging them
- Avoiding places, people, or conversations that trigger discomfort
- Suppressing thoughts and telling yourself to “just stop thinking about it”
At first, these strategies reduce discomfort. That relief reinforces the behaviour. Over time, however, avoidance can quietly expand and shape how we live.
Why We Are Wired to Avoid Discomfort
Avoidance is not weakness. It is part of survival.
Emotional pain activates many of the same neural pathways involved in physical pain (Eisenberger et al., 2003). Rejection, embarrassment, or loss can therefore feel threatening at a biological level.
From the brain’s perspective, moving away from discomfort is logical. When avoidance reduces distress, even temporarily, it strengthens the habit. The nervous system learns: This reduces discomfort, so repeat it.
The problem is not the instinct itself. The problem is when avoidance becomes rigid and automatic.
The Paradox of Suppression
Many people believe that if they can simply stop thinking about something painful, it will disappear. Research suggests the opposite often happens.
Wegner (1994) demonstrated what is known as the “ironic process” of mental control: when people try not to think about something, the thought often rebounds and becomes more persistent.
If you have ever tried not to replay an awkward conversation, only to think about it more, you have experienced this effect.
Emotional suppression may reduce outward expression, but it does not necessarily reduce internal distress. In fact, suppression has been associated with poorer psychological outcomes and reduced wellbeing over time (Gross & John, 2003).
Avoidance may feel protective. It does not always resolve what is underneath.
When Avoidance Becomes a Trap
Research consistently links experiential avoidance to anxiety, depression, and broader psychological distress (Berghoff et al., 2016).
When we avoid difficult emotions:
- We avoid conversations that could resolve conflict
- We avoid opportunities that carry risk
- We avoid vulnerability in relationships
- We avoid grief and delay healing
Life can gradually narrow.
Someone who avoids social anxiety may decline invitations repeatedly. Someone who avoids shame may never admit mistakes. Someone who avoids sadness may struggle to process loss.
The original emotion may have been uncomfortable but temporary. The long-term consequences of avoidance can be far more limiting.
The Impact on Relationships
Emotional avoidance often shows up most clearly in close relationships.
You might avoid telling your partner that you feel hurt. You might change the subject when a friend asks how you are coping. You might distract yourself when jealousy or insecurity arises.
Research shows that habitual emotional suppression is associated with lower relationship satisfaction and less authentic connection (Gross & John, 2003).
When emotions are consistently hidden, intimacy becomes harder to sustain. Vulnerability, though uncomfortable, is often what builds closeness.
Growth Requires Discomfort
Many people reach a point where they want to change, grow, and let go of old habits. Yet the discomfort required for growth feels overwhelming.
Psychological flexibility, the ability to stay present and act according to values even in the presence of discomfort, is strongly associated with wellbeing.
Avoidance promises immediate relief. Willingness creates long-term resilience.
Facing emotions does not mean exaggerating them or dwelling on them. It means allowing them to exist without immediately trying to eliminate them.
A Different Way Forward
Shifting away from avoidance does not mean confronting everything at once.
It starts with small steps:
- Noticing what you are feeling
- Naming the emotion rather than suppressing it
- Staying present for a few moments longer than usual
- Choosing actions aligned with your values, even if discomfort is present
Emotions rise, peak, and fall. When we interrupt that process through avoidance, they tend to linger. When we allow them space, they often move through more naturally.
Emotional courage is built gradually. Tolerance grows with practice.
Conclusion
Avoiding painful emotions does not mean you are flawed. It means you are human.
The instinct to protect yourself from discomfort is natural. But when avoidance begins to shape your decisions, relationships, and sense of identity, it may be time to respond differently.
Learning to stay with difficult feelings is not about forcing yourself to suffer. It is about building confidence in your ability to handle what arises.
If you recognise patterns of avoidance in your life and would like structured support in developing healthier coping strategies, consider reaching out to ImPossible Psychological Services. Professional guidance can help you strengthen psychological flexibility, build emotional resilience, and move towards a life guided by values rather than fear.
References
Berghoff, C. R., Tull, M. T., DiLillo, D., Messman-Moore, T., & Gratz, K. L. (2017). The Role of Experiential Avoidance in the Relation between Anxiety Disorder Diagnoses and Future Physical Health Symptoms in a Community Sample of Young Adult Women. Journal of contextual behavioral science, 6(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.11.002
Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290–292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089134
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.34